How do the views of ‘constructivist’ theorists about international security differ from those of ‘neorealists”

Much of this analysis will draw from the work of British historian Eric Hobsbawm, arguably one of the most prominent scholars of the history of globalization. We then conclude with an overview of the issues explored and argue that neoliberalism and globalization are intrinsically intertwined.Neoliberalism has been the driving force of the global economic order since the latter half of the twentieth century. The current state of world affairs has its precursors in the social revolution of the 1960s, economic crises in the 1970s culminating the collapse of the New Deal and the OPEC oil crisis, as well as the emergence of neo-liberalism as a driving political and economic force in the 1980s. Events from the late 1960s reverberated in the Communist world and finally came to a head in the 1980s with total economic and political collapse. The Soviet sphere, coupled with the former Yugoslavia, provide the best examples of this phenomenon. Additionally, the end of the Cold War has had important implications for the already precarious states of Africa and has coincided with the emergence of Asian economic Tigers: a global economic shift towards emerging East Asian powerhouses. Our current wave of globalization will be traced back to the late 1960s, beginning with the social revolution of that decade, and will end with today’s international state of affairs.The social revolution of the 1960s was also a cultural revolution. In fact, the rise of a specific, and extraordinarily powerful youth culture indicated a profound change in the relation between generations (Hobsbawm 1994, p. 324). Leading this cultural revolution were the young: teenagers started wearing jeans – prior to that only farmers wore them – and rock music became the voice of a generation (Hobsbawm 1994, p. 324). In fact, industries saw the potential

You Might Also Like