Draft2

The intersection Causing AnthropoceneThe current error is characterized by the extinction of various species of both aquatic and nonaquatic vegetation, animals, and birds as a result of the polluted sea and ocean waters changed atmospheric climate and other implications of human conduct. Frederic Neyrat shows in the reading, “The Logic of Geopower: Power, Management, and Earth Stewardship”, which homo sapiens currently focus on shifting to global financial prudence through industrialization whose focus leaves geologists concerned as they consider the effects of global shifts on the Earth (Neyrat 65). The link between industrialized economies, government administration, and media in the form of news communication and art (known as Capitalocene by philosophers) has kept geologists worried about the Earth and varying climate. My central claim is that intersection of customers, technology corporations, governments, and individual rights to online information is the leading cause of Earth’s recent entry into a new era of Anthropocene.Home sapiens have dominated the variation and changes taking place in the atmosphere, oceans, and seas as well as the land. The link facilitated entry into the Anthropocene era since the beginning of the current automated industry and utilization of fossil energies, says Simon Dalby in the “Biopolitics and Climate Security in the Anthropocene” (Dalby 187). The intersection has caused technology to advance at a very high rate leading to changes in the business handling process globally, especially for technological companies such as Apple Inc., Google, Amazon, IBM, among many others. Apple Incorporation’s recent report about selling a billion of its iOS products provides evidence of the sheering amount of electronic instruments and devices on the globe. The criticism of Apple and other technology corporations for implementation of design tactics that have negative implications on the environment and government is not banning them due to the intersection supports this evidence. The probability of geologists encountering massive quantities of electronic and microelectronic waste in the future is very high, proving that the intersection is facilitating entry into the Anthropocene epoch.
Besides, the technology brings not only the interactions but also the pollution. The wastes of electronics, media has increased pollution through newspaper remains, noise, emission, and others as a result of the internet that has accelerated the issue of technological muddle (Neyrat 57). The advanced technology world is characterized by increased interactions between consumers and technological corporations via different social media platforms such as corporation websites, Facebook, among others. Rights to individual information online have enhanced the use of media, leading to dumping of vast seams of newspapers, hard disks, books, and DVDs on the Earth’s surface but go underground as time goes on. This fossil and vestige record (known as the geology of media by geologists) has negative, severe, and enduring implications to species, which can prompt the present geological epoch to be declared Anthropocene. This media sub-claim supports the central claim that the intersection of customers, technology corporations, governments, and individual rights to online information is the leading cause of Earth’s recent entry into a new era of Anthropocene.The government affects geology directly through political affairs, structural designs, and projects. Worldwide economies demand enlargement of business structures that require massive sand volume for earthworks and fortifications, leading to the importation of sand by some of the countries such as Singapore. Sand mining for new architectural designs for worldwide economies by Homo sapiens destroys riparian and aquatic life through the destruction of habitats caused by alteration of stream or ocean morphology. Implications that alter the morphology include degradation and coursing of bed, lowering of water tables, and causing instability of aquatic sources hence the extinction of various species. The government affects the globe as the governing body involved in the governance of the interactions between the technological corporations and their consumers. Consumers and corporations have the right to individual data. Still, it is suffering issues of privacy, leading to the need for more software installation for security purposes hence more pollution. Technology advancement is also associated with increased pollution through emissions of greenhouse gases (Neyrat 57). Technology is made to improve human life, but it is endangering the lives of other aquatic vegetation and animals; hence Homo sapiens predominate the current epoch. Public government regulations that can adapt to technological changes are required to empower innovations driven by environmental protection. Still, the government’s intersection with technology corporations has hindered the development of such legislation. This evidence supports the claim that the intersection of customers, technology corporations, governments, and individual rights to online information is the leading cause of Earth’s recent entry into a new era of Anthropocene.Neyrat’s words support the claim that the intersection of customers, technology corporations, governments, and individual rights to online information is the leading cause of Earth’s recent entry into a new era of Anthropocene. The main aim of stewardship of the Earth is to ensure the protection of human welfare through the protection of the environment but not to safeguard people from the environment (Neyrat 57). Earth’s stewardship should be based on the viewpoint that can integrate more approaches and metrics than the environmentalists had traditionally considered. Neyra agrees to the fact that technology is right as it makes human life comfortable hence cannot be resisted by human beings. However, the writer suggests that technologies are implemented by people with the capability to make a variety of innovations. The innovations may include the use of alternative sources of energy other than the use of fuel in technological advancement. This information indicates that humanity has the power to control pollution in a technologically advancing world, but the intersection has hindered the development of environmentally friendly technologies. Neyret supports my claim on intersection by expounding on Anthropocene’s dualistic political groups to emphasize the need of government to counter power the technologically aided stewardship of the Earth, which is harmful to the environment hence causing climate change (Neyrat 59). The technically supported stewardship focuses on spontaneously generating different technologies unconsciously to progress but deny the setting by technological companies and unconscious utilization by consumers. The government should counter power this stewardship by creating laws to govern protection of the environment and personal rights on individual or technological company online data, but the intersection hinders the counteraction.My sub-claim that the intersection has caused adverse effects on the environment is supported by Dalby when he expounds on occurring changes in the physical environment as a result of practices that provide security to specific forms of humanoid life. He mentions substantial social order driven by carboniferous private enterprises and entrepreneurs that utilize these practices to secure humans. The social order represents the technological companies powered by fuel utilizing machines that pollute the environment, and methods are used to describe current innovations made to improve human life. Dalby mentions climate change and security as one vital scope related to the future that government (biopolitical) approaches of risk and contingency management have messed up to address effectually (Dalby 187). This information indicates that the government does not govern some technological perils, and the intersection between all the components has hindered a positive change by making the government reluctant to punish technology firms’ environmental misconduct.Technology should protect humans, and the environment’s safety protects humans from dangers associated with climate change as a result of pollution. Dalby interprets that the argument about association climate and safety stresses that Anthropocene’s environmental situations require altered biopolitics for better handling (Dalby 185). Current knowledge in the management of risk is not capable of adequate protection for the human. The positive intersection is required for the government to generate laws that govern consumer-corporation relationships and the security of individual information online. Dalby’s suggestion for new biopolitics supports the thesis that public government regulations that can adapt to technological changes are required to empower innovations driven by data privacy and environmental protection. The argument on the current ecological situation supports the claim that the intersection of customers, technology corporations, governments, and individual rights to online information is the leading cause of Earth’s recent entry into a new era of Anthropocene.Works CitedDalby, Simon. “Biopolitics and Climate Security in the Anthropocene.” Geoforum, vol. 49, Oct. 2013, pp. 184-192. ScienceDirect, doi: do.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.13. Neyret, Frederic. “The Logic of Geo power: Power, Management, and Earth Stewardship.” The Unconstructable Earth: AnEcology of Separation. Fordham U, 2019, pp. 56-67.                                                                                REQUIREMENTS:- Up to 1500-1800 words- write the sub-claims at the beginning of body paragraph- introduce the authors before citing their words- you say that Neyret supports your claim but try not to use this language too much.

You Might Also Like